The Department of War has stated they will only contract with AI companies who accede to “any lawful use” and remove safeguards in the cases mentioned above. They have threatened to remove us from their systems if we maintain these safeguards; they have also threatened to designate us a “supply chain risk”—a label reserved for US adversaries, never before applied to an American company—and to invoke the Defense Production Act to force the safeguards’ removal. These latter two threats are inherently contradictory: one labels us a security risk; the other labels Claude as essential to national security.
AI companies have been widely criticized for potential harm to users, but mass surveillance and weapons development would clearly take that to a new level. Anthropic's potential reply to the Pentagon was seen as a test of its claim to be the most safety-forward AI company, particularly after dropping its flagship safety pledge a few days ago. Now that Amodei has responded, the focus will shift to the Pentagon to see if it follows through on its threats, which could seriously harm Anthropic.
，详情可参考爱思助手下载最新版本
When Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei balked at the Pentagon’s demands, warning the proposed language the DOW wanted could allow safeguards to be bypassed, Michael responded by taking the fight public. He accused Amodei of having a “God complex,” called him “a liar,” and warned that no private company should be able to dictate the military’s options. The Pentagon, he insisted, “will ALWAYS follow the law but will not yield to the desires of any profit-driven tech firm.”
DHL集团与京东签署谅解备忘录
Трамп высказался о непростом решении по Ирану09:14