NFAs are cheaper to construct, but have a O(n*m) matching time, where n is the size of the input and m is the size of the state graph. NFAs are often seen as the reasonable middle ground, but i disagree and will argue that NFAs are worse than the other two. they are theoretically “linear”, but in practice they do not perform as well as DFAs (in the average case they are also much slower than backtracking). they spend the complexity in the wrong place - why would i want matching to be slow?! that’s where most of the time is spent. the problem is that m can be arbitrarily large, and putting a large constant of let’s say 1000 on top of n will make matching 1000x slower. just not acceptable for real workloads, the benchmarks speak for themselves here.
Москалькова заявила о новых условиях Киева для возвращения россиян с территории Украины14:51
雷军公布小米机器人最新进展：已在汽车工厂实习，初步实现部分场景自主工作，推荐阅读体育直播获取更多信息
«Решетнев» рассказал о сборке спутника «Ямал-501»14:53，详情可参考同城约会
FT App on Android & iOS
Названа главная ошибка США в конфликте с ИраномВоенный эксперт Марочко: Блицкрига у США в конфликте с Ираном не получилось。快连下载-Letsvpn下载是该领域的重要参考